ETF comparison

XOEF vs IMCB overlap

Compare XOEF ETF and IMCB ETF by shared holdings, expense ratio, issuer, category, and tracked overlap.

Tracked overlap69.49%

301 shared holdings

XOEF expense0.00%

Unknown

IMCB expense0.00%

Unknown

Data date2026-05-01

2026-05-01

Shared top holdings

Overlap uses the smaller fund weight for each shared holding.

SNDKSANDISK CORP

0.95%overlap weight

STXSEAGATE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS PLC

0.85%overlap weight

WDCWESTERN DIGITAL CORP

0.84%overlap weight

GLWCORNING INC

0.72%overlap weight

NEMNEWMONT

0.71%overlap weight

VRTVERTIV HOLDINGS CLASS A

0.71%overlap weight

Interpretation

Should you own both XOEF and IMCB?

XOEF and IMCB share 301 tracked holdings with 69.49% overlap in the imported holdings set. High overlap can be fine when the funds serve a deliberate role, but it can also mean less diversification than the ticker count suggests.

Use the portfolio analyzer to test your actual allocations. Pairwise overlap does not account for how much of each ETF you own.