ETF comparison

SLVP vs RING overlap

Compare SLVP ETF and RING ETF by shared holdings, expense ratio, issuer, category, and tracked overlap.

Tracked overlap28.21%

13 shared holdings

SLVP expense0.00%

Unknown

RING expense0.00%

Unknown

Data date2026-05-01

2026-05-01

Shared top holdings

Overlap uses the smaller fund weight for each shared holding.

NEMNEWMONT

4.53%overlap weight

AEMAGNICO EAGLE MINES LTD

4.46%overlap weight

WPMWHEATON PRECIOUS METALS CORP

4.21%overlap weight

KKINROSS GOLD CORP

3.34%overlap weight

CDECOEUR MINING INC

2.82%overlap weight

PAASPAN AMERICAN SILVER CORP

1.81%overlap weight

Interpretation

Should you own both SLVP and RING?

SLVP and RING share 13 tracked holdings with 28.21% overlap in the imported holdings set. High overlap can be fine when the funds serve a deliberate role, but it can also mean less diversification than the ticker count suggests.

Use the portfolio analyzer to test your actual allocations. Pairwise overlap does not account for how much of each ETF you own.