ETF comparison

SECU vs BINC overlap

Compare SECU ETF and BINC ETF by shared holdings, expense ratio, issuer, category, and tracked overlap.

Tracked overlap11.74%

315 shared holdings

SECU expense0.00%

Unknown

BINC expense0.00%

Unknown

Data date2026-05-01

2026-05-01

Shared top holdings

Overlap uses the smaller fund weight for each shared holding.

UM30UMBS 30YR TBA(REG A)

1.00%overlap weight

UM30UMBS 30YR TBA(REG A)

0.25%overlap weight

UM30UMBS 30YR TBA(REG A)

0.23%overlap weight

AOMT_21-5-A1AOMT_21-5 A1 144A

0.12%overlap weight

BARC_25-NQM3-A1BARC_25-NQM3 A1 144A

0.11%overlap weight

BHMS_25-ATLS-ABHMS_25-ATLS A 144A

0.10%overlap weight

Interpretation

Should you own both SECU and BINC?

SECU and BINC share 315 tracked holdings with 11.74% overlap in the imported holdings set. High overlap can be fine when the funds serve a deliberate role, but it can also mean less diversification than the ticker count suggests.

Use the portfolio analyzer to test your actual allocations. Pairwise overlap does not account for how much of each ETF you own.