ETF comparison
SCZ vs SCJ overlap
Compare SCZ ETF and SCJ ETF by shared holdings, expense ratio, issuer, category, and tracked overlap.
Tracked overlap35.87%
777 shared holdings
SCZ expense0.00%
Unknown
SCJ expense0.00%
Unknown
Data date2026-05-01
2026-05-01
Shared top holdings
Overlap uses the smaller fund weight for each shared holding.
5801FURUKAWA ELECTRIC LTD
4004RESONAC HOLDINGS
5706MITSUI KINZOKU LIMITED LTD
2768SOJITZ CORP
5334NITERRA LTD
6525KOKUSAI ELECTRIC CORP
Interpretation
Should you own both SCZ and SCJ?
SCZ and SCJ share 777 tracked holdings with 35.87% overlap in the imported holdings set. High overlap can be fine when the funds serve a deliberate role, but it can also mean less diversification than the ticker count suggests.
Use the portfolio analyzer to test your actual allocations. Pairwise overlap does not account for how much of each ETF you own.