ETF comparison
SCZ vs IPAC overlap
Compare SCZ ETF and IPAC ETF by shared holdings, expense ratio, issuer, category, and tracked overlap.
Tracked overlap20.25%
908 shared holdings
SCZ expense0.00%
Unknown
IPAC expense0.00%
Unknown
Data date2026-05-01
2026-05-01
Shared top holdings
Overlap uses the smaller fund weight for each shared holding.
5801FURUKAWA ELECTRIC LTD
4004RESONAC HOLDINGS
5706MITSUI KINZOKU LIMITED LTD
PLSPLS GROUP LTD
BSLBLUESCOPE STEEL LTD
SUNSULZER AG
Interpretation
Should you own both SCZ and IPAC?
SCZ and IPAC share 908 tracked holdings with 20.25% overlap in the imported holdings set. High overlap can be fine when the funds serve a deliberate role, but it can also mean less diversification than the ticker count suggests.
Use the portfolio analyzer to test your actual allocations. Pairwise overlap does not account for how much of each ETF you own.