ETF comparison

SCJ vs IFGL overlap

Compare SCJ ETF and IFGL ETF by shared holdings, expense ratio, issuer, category, and tracked overlap.

Tracked overlap7.08%

49 shared holdings

SCJ expense0.00%

Unknown

IFGL expense0.00%

Unknown

Data date2026-05-01

2026-05-01

Shared top holdings

Overlap uses the smaller fund weight for each shared holding.

8953JAPAN METROPOLITAN FUND INVESTMENT

0.39%overlap weight

8952JAPAN REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST

0.36%overlap weight

8804TOKYO TATEMONO LTD

0.32%overlap weight

8972KDX REALTY INVESTMENT REIT CORP

0.32%overlap weight

3281GLP J-REIT REIT

0.30%overlap weight

3462NOMURA REAL ESTATE MASTER FUND REI

0.30%overlap weight

Interpretation

Should you own both SCJ and IFGL?

SCJ and IFGL share 49 tracked holdings with 7.08% overlap in the imported holdings set. High overlap can be fine when the funds serve a deliberate role, but it can also mean less diversification than the ticker count suggests.

Use the portfolio analyzer to test your actual allocations. Pairwise overlap does not account for how much of each ETF you own.