ETF comparison

RING vs EWC overlap

Compare RING ETF and EWC ETF by shared holdings, expense ratio, issuer, category, and tracked overlap.

Tracked overlap9.95%

7 shared holdings

RING expense0.00%

Unknown

EWC expense0.00%

Unknown

Data date2026-05-01

2026-05-01

Shared top holdings

Overlap uses the smaller fund weight for each shared holding.

AEMAGNICO EAGLE MINES LTD

3.10%overlap weight

ABXBARRICK MINING CORP

2.18%overlap weight

WPMWHEATON PRECIOUS METALS CORP

1.91%overlap weight

KKINROSS GOLD CORP

1.21%overlap weight

PAASPAN AMERICAN SILVER CORP

0.73%overlap weight

AGIALAMOS GOLD INC CLASS A

0.58%overlap weight

Interpretation

Should you own both RING and EWC?

RING and EWC share 7 tracked holdings with 9.95% overlap in the imported holdings set. High overlap can be fine when the funds serve a deliberate role, but it can also mean less diversification than the ticker count suggests.

Use the portfolio analyzer to test your actual allocations. Pairwise overlap does not account for how much of each ETF you own.