ETF comparison

QNXT vs IMCB overlap

Compare QNXT ETF and IMCB ETF by shared holdings, expense ratio, issuer, category, and tracked overlap.

Tracked overlap17.21%

47 shared holdings

QNXT expense0.00%

Unknown

IMCB expense0.00%

Unknown

Data date2026-05-01

2026-05-01

Shared top holdings

Overlap uses the smaller fund weight for each shared holding.

STXSEAGATE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS PLC

1.02%overlap weight

WDCWESTERN DIGITAL CORP

0.99%overlap weight

MRVLMARVELL TECHNOLOGY INC

0.97%overlap weight

CSXCSX CORP

0.59%overlap weight

MDLZMONDELEZ INTERNATIONAL INC CLASS A

0.56%overlap weight

MARMARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL INC CLASS A

0.55%overlap weight

Interpretation

Should you own both QNXT and IMCB?

QNXT and IMCB share 47 tracked holdings with 17.21% overlap in the imported holdings set. High overlap can be fine when the funds serve a deliberate role, but it can also mean less diversification than the ticker count suggests.

Use the portfolio analyzer to test your actual allocations. Pairwise overlap does not account for how much of each ETF you own.