ETF comparison

PABD vs EFA overlap

Compare PABD ETF and EFA ETF by shared holdings, expense ratio, issuer, category, and tracked overlap.

Tracked overlap54.51%

337 shared holdings

PABD expense0.00%

Unknown

EFA expense0.00%

Unknown

Data date2026-05-01

2026-05-01

Shared top holdings

Overlap uses the smaller fund weight for each shared holding.

ASMLASML HOLDING NV

2.54%overlap weight

HSBAHSBC HOLDINGS PLC

1.40%overlap weight

AZNASTRAZENECA PLC

1.34%overlap weight

ROPROCHE PS PAR AG

1.32%overlap weight

NOVNNOVARTIS AG

1.28%overlap weight

CBACOMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA

0.96%overlap weight

Interpretation

Should you own both PABD and EFA?

PABD and EFA share 337 tracked holdings with 54.51% overlap in the imported holdings set. High overlap can be fine when the funds serve a deliberate role, but it can also mean less diversification than the ticker count suggests.

Use the portfolio analyzer to test your actual allocations. Pairwise overlap does not account for how much of each ETF you own.