ETF comparison

NEAR vs IWB overlap

Compare NEAR ETF and IWB ETF by shared holdings, expense ratio, issuer, category, and tracked overlap.

Tracked overlap23.28%

340 shared holdings

NEAR expense0.00%

Unknown

IWB expense0.00%

Unknown

Data date2026-05-01

2026-05-01

Shared top holdings

Overlap uses the smaller fund weight for each shared holding.

JPMJPMORGAN CHASE & CO

0.42%overlap weight

CCITIGROUP INC (FXD-FRN)

0.34%overlap weight

MSMORGAN STANLEY PRIVATE BANK NA

0.33%overlap weight

AMZNAMAZON.COM INC

0.33%overlap weight

GSGOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC/THE

0.33%overlap weight

CCITIGROUP INC (FXD-FRN)

0.31%overlap weight

Interpretation

Should you own both NEAR and IWB?

NEAR and IWB share 340 tracked holdings with 23.28% overlap in the imported holdings set. High overlap can be fine when the funds serve a deliberate role, but it can also mean less diversification than the ticker count suggests.

Use the portfolio analyzer to test your actual allocations. Pairwise overlap does not account for how much of each ETF you own.