ETF comparison

MCHI vs EEMA overlap

Compare MCHI ETF and EEMA ETF by shared holdings, expense ratio, issuer, category, and tracked overlap.

Tracked overlap29.82%

461 shared holdings

MCHI expense0.00%

Unknown

EEMA expense0.00%

Unknown

Data date2026-05-01

2026-05-01

Shared top holdings

Overlap uses the smaller fund weight for each shared holding.

9988ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LTD

2.96%overlap weight

700TENCENT HOLDINGS LTD

2.74%overlap weight

939CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK CORP H

1.17%overlap weight

PDDPDD HOLDINGS ADS INC

0.73%overlap weight

1810XIAOMI CORP

0.69%overlap weight

1398INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL BANK OF

0.63%overlap weight

Interpretation

Should you own both MCHI and EEMA?

MCHI and EEMA share 461 tracked holdings with 29.82% overlap in the imported holdings set. High overlap can be fine when the funds serve a deliberate role, but it can also mean less diversification than the ticker count suggests.

Use the portfolio analyzer to test your actual allocations. Pairwise overlap does not account for how much of each ETF you own.