ETF comparison

MBBA vs BRTR overlap

Compare MBBA ETF and BRTR ETF by shared holdings, expense ratio, issuer, category, and tracked overlap.

Tracked overlap24.22%

107 shared holdings

MBBA expense0.00%

Unknown

BRTR expense0.00%

Unknown

Data date2026-05-01

2026-05-01

Shared top holdings

Overlap uses the smaller fund weight for each shared holding.

UM30UMBS 30YR TBA(REG A)

8.38%overlap weight

UM30UMBS 30YR TBA(REG A)

2.02%overlap weight

UM30UMBS 30YR TBA(REG A)

1.91%overlap weight

UM30UMBS 30YR TBA(REG A)

1.45%overlap weight

UM30UMBS 30YR TBA(REG A)

0.62%overlap weight

UM30UMBS 30YR TBA

0.58%overlap weight

Interpretation

Should you own both MBBA and BRTR?

MBBA and BRTR share 107 tracked holdings with 24.22% overlap in the imported holdings set. High overlap can be fine when the funds serve a deliberate role, but it can also mean less diversification than the ticker count suggests.

Use the portfolio analyzer to test your actual allocations. Pairwise overlap does not account for how much of each ETF you own.