ETF comparison

IXJ vs BMED overlap

Compare IXJ ETF and BMED ETF by shared holdings, expense ratio, issuer, category, and tracked overlap.

Tracked overlap34.28%

26 shared holdings

IXJ expense0.00%

Unknown

BMED expense0.00%

Unknown

Data date2026-05-01

2026-05-01

Shared top holdings

Overlap uses the smaller fund weight for each shared holding.

JNJJOHNSON & JOHNSON

7.34%overlap weight

AMGNAMGEN INC

2.49%overlap weight

NOVNNOVARTIS AG

2.28%overlap weight

ISRGINTUITIVE SURGICAL INC

2.21%overlap weight

GILDGILEAD SCIENCES INC

2.19%overlap weight

PFEPFIZER INC

2.05%overlap weight

Interpretation

Should you own both IXJ and BMED?

IXJ and BMED share 26 tracked holdings with 34.28% overlap in the imported holdings set. High overlap can be fine when the funds serve a deliberate role, but it can also mean less diversification than the ticker count suggests.

Use the portfolio analyzer to test your actual allocations. Pairwise overlap does not account for how much of each ETF you own.