ETF comparison

ISCG vs SQLT overlap

Compare ISCG ETF and SQLT ETF by shared holdings, expense ratio, issuer, category, and tracked overlap.

Tracked overlap39.07%

310 shared holdings

ISCG expense0.00%

Unknown

SQLT expense0.00%

Unknown

Data date2026-05-01

2026-05-01

Shared top holdings

Overlap uses the smaller fund weight for each shared holding.

ITTITT INC

0.63%overlap weight

LSCCLATTICE SEMICONDUCTOR CORP

0.54%overlap weight

MLIMUELLER INDUSTRIES INC

0.50%overlap weight

LECOLINCOLN ELECTRIC HOLDINGS INC

0.49%overlap weight

STRLSTERLING INFRASTRUCTURE INC

0.49%overlap weight

ONTOONTO INNOVATION INC

0.48%overlap weight

Interpretation

Should you own both ISCG and SQLT?

ISCG and SQLT share 310 tracked holdings with 39.07% overlap in the imported holdings set. High overlap can be fine when the funds serve a deliberate role, but it can also mean less diversification than the ticker count suggests.

Use the portfolio analyzer to test your actual allocations. Pairwise overlap does not account for how much of each ETF you own.