ETF comparison

IPAC vs IEFA overlap

Compare IPAC ETF and IEFA ETF by shared holdings, expense ratio, issuer, category, and tracked overlap.

Tracked overlap34.65%

763 shared holdings

IPAC expense0.00%

Unknown

IEFA expense0.00%

Unknown

Data date2026-05-01

2026-05-01

Shared top holdings

Overlap uses the smaller fund weight for each shared holding.

CBACOMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA

0.83%overlap weight

8306MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP INC

0.81%overlap weight

BHPBHP GROUP LTD

0.80%overlap weight

7203TOYOTA MOTOR CORP

0.74%overlap weight

6501HITACHI LTD

0.58%overlap weight

6857ADVANTEST CORP

0.57%overlap weight

Interpretation

Should you own both IPAC and IEFA?

IPAC and IEFA share 763 tracked holdings with 34.65% overlap in the imported holdings set. High overlap can be fine when the funds serve a deliberate role, but it can also mean less diversification than the ticker count suggests.

Use the portfolio analyzer to test your actual allocations. Pairwise overlap does not account for how much of each ETF you own.