ETF comparison

IPAC vs HEWJ overlap

Compare IPAC ETF and HEWJ ETF by shared holdings, expense ratio, issuer, category, and tracked overlap.

Tracked overlap54.10%

177 shared holdings

IPAC expense0.00%

Unknown

HEWJ expense0.00%

Unknown

Data date2026-05-01

2026-05-01

Shared top holdings

Overlap uses the smaller fund weight for each shared holding.

8306MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP INC

2.24%overlap weight

7203TOYOTA MOTOR CORP

2.04%overlap weight

6501HITACHI LTD

1.59%overlap weight

6857ADVANTEST CORP

1.57%overlap weight

8316SUMITOMO MITSUI FINANCIAL GROUP IN

1.43%overlap weight

8035TOKYO ELECTRON LTD

1.40%overlap weight

Interpretation

Should you own both IPAC and HEWJ?

IPAC and HEWJ share 177 tracked holdings with 54.10% overlap in the imported holdings set. High overlap can be fine when the funds serve a deliberate role, but it can also mean less diversification than the ticker count suggests.

Use the portfolio analyzer to test your actual allocations. Pairwise overlap does not account for how much of each ETF you own.