ETF comparison

IMCB vs SIZE overlap

Compare IMCB ETF and SIZE ETF by shared holdings, expense ratio, issuer, category, and tracked overlap.

Tracked overlap61.62%

369 shared holdings

IMCB expense0.00%

Unknown

SIZE expense0.00%

Unknown

Data date2026-05-01

2026-05-01

Shared top holdings

Overlap uses the smaller fund weight for each shared holding.

WDCWESTERN DIGITAL CORP

0.44%overlap weight

BEBLOOM ENERGY CLASS A CORP

0.42%overlap weight

CIENCIENA CORP

0.42%overlap weight

STXSEAGATE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS PLC

0.40%overlap weight

KEYSKEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES INC

0.33%overlap weight

FIXCOMFORT SYSTEMS USA INC

0.32%overlap weight

Interpretation

Should you own both IMCB and SIZE?

IMCB and SIZE share 369 tracked holdings with 61.62% overlap in the imported holdings set. High overlap can be fine when the funds serve a deliberate role, but it can also mean less diversification than the ticker count suggests.

Use the portfolio analyzer to test your actual allocations. Pairwise overlap does not account for how much of each ETF you own.