ETF comparison
IFGL vs SCZ overlap
Compare IFGL ETF and SCZ ETF by shared holdings, expense ratio, issuer, category, and tracked overlap.
Tracked overlap8.63%
158 shared holdings
IFGL expense0.00%
Unknown
SCZ expense0.00%
Unknown
Data date2026-05-01
2026-05-01
Shared top holdings
Overlap uses the smaller fund weight for each shared holding.
PSPNPSP SWISS PROPERTY AG
MRLMERLIN PROPERTIES REIT SA
AEDAEDIFICA NV
CHCCHARTER HALL GROUP STAPLED UNITS
GPTGPT GROUP STAPLED UNITS
NXTNEXTDC LTD
Interpretation
Should you own both IFGL and SCZ?
IFGL and SCZ share 158 tracked holdings with 8.63% overlap in the imported holdings set. High overlap can be fine when the funds serve a deliberate role, but it can also mean less diversification than the ticker count suggests.
Use the portfolio analyzer to test your actual allocations. Pairwise overlap does not account for how much of each ETF you own.