ETF comparison

EWS vs IPAC overlap

Compare EWS ETF and IPAC ETF by shared holdings, expense ratio, issuer, category, and tracked overlap.

Tracked overlap2.64%

15 shared holdings

EWS expense0.00%

Unknown

IPAC expense0.00%

Unknown

Data date2026-05-01

2026-05-01

Shared top holdings

Overlap uses the smaller fund weight for each shared holding.

O39OVERSEA-CHINESE BANKING LTD

0.63%overlap weight

U11UNITED OVERSEAS BANK LTD

0.39%overlap weight

SESEA ADS REPRESENTING LTD CLASS A

0.36%overlap weight

Z74SINGAPORE TELECOMMUNICATIONS LTD

0.29%overlap weight

S63SINGAPORE TECHNOLOGIES ENGINEERING

0.14%overlap weight

BN4KEPPEL LTD

0.14%overlap weight

Interpretation

Should you own both EWS and IPAC?

EWS and IPAC share 15 tracked holdings with 2.64% overlap in the imported holdings set. High overlap can be fine when the funds serve a deliberate role, but it can also mean less diversification than the ticker count suggests.

Use the portfolio analyzer to test your actual allocations. Pairwise overlap does not account for how much of each ETF you own.