ETF comparison

EWA vs IPAC overlap

Compare EWA ETF and IPAC ETF by shared holdings, expense ratio, issuer, category, and tracked overlap.

Tracked overlap15.66%

46 shared holdings

EWA expense0.00%

Unknown

IPAC expense0.00%

Unknown

Data date2026-05-01

2026-05-01

Shared top holdings

Overlap uses the smaller fund weight for each shared holding.

CBACOMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA

2.27%overlap weight

BHPBHP GROUP LTD

2.20%overlap weight

WBCWESTPAC BANKING CORPORATION CORP

1.03%overlap weight

NABNATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK LTD

0.96%overlap weight

ANZANZ GROUP HOLDINGS LTD

0.86%overlap weight

MQGMACQUARIE GROUP LTD DEF

0.67%overlap weight

Interpretation

Should you own both EWA and IPAC?

EWA and IPAC share 46 tracked holdings with 15.66% overlap in the imported holdings set. High overlap can be fine when the funds serve a deliberate role, but it can also mean less diversification than the ticker count suggests.

Use the portfolio analyzer to test your actual allocations. Pairwise overlap does not account for how much of each ETF you own.