ETF Overlap Checker

ETF comparison

ERET vs IFGL overlap

Compare ERET ETF and IFGL ETF by shared holdings, expense ratio, issuer, category, and tracked overlap.

Tracked overlap36.60%

235 shared holdings

ERET expense0.00%

Unknown

IFGL expense0.00%

Unknown

Data date2026-05-01

2026-05-01

Shared top holdings

Overlap uses the smaller fund weight for each shared holding.

GMGGOODMAN GROUP UNITS
1.83%overlap weight
8802MITSUBISHI ESTATE CO LTD
1.80%overlap weight
8801MITSUI FUDOSAN LTD
1.53%overlap weight
16SUN HUNG KAI PROPERTIES LTD
1.20%overlap weight
8830SUMITOMO REALTY & DEVELOPMENT LTD
0.98%overlap weight
VNAVONOVIA SE
0.96%overlap weight

Interpretation

Should you own both ERET and IFGL?

ERET and IFGL share 235 tracked holdings with 36.60% overlap in the imported holdings set. High overlap can be fine when the funds serve a deliberate role, but it can also mean less diversification than the ticker count suggests.

Use the portfolio analyzer to test your actual allocations. Pairwise overlap does not account for how much of each ETF you own.