ETF Overlap Checker

ETF comparison

EDEN vs HSCZ overlap

Compare EDEN ETF and HSCZ ETF by shared holdings, expense ratio, issuer, category, and tracked overlap.

Tracked overlap1.51%

20 shared holdings

EDEN expense0.00%

Unknown

HSCZ expense0.00%

Unknown

Data date2026-05-01

2026-05-01

Shared top holdings

Overlap uses the smaller fund weight for each shared holding.

NKTNKT
0.21%overlap weight
RILBARINGKJOBING LANDBOBANK
0.18%overlap weight
JYSKJYSKE BANK
0.17%overlap weight
ALSYDBAL SYDBANK
0.15%overlap weight
ISSISS A S
0.14%overlap weight
ZEALZEALAND PHARMA
0.09%overlap weight

Interpretation

Should you own both EDEN and HSCZ?

EDEN and HSCZ share 20 tracked holdings with 1.51% overlap in the imported holdings set. High overlap can be fine when the funds serve a deliberate role, but it can also mean less diversification than the ticker count suggests.

Use the portfolio analyzer to test your actual allocations. Pairwise overlap does not account for how much of each ETF you own.