ETF comparison

ECNS vs IGF overlap

Compare ECNS ETF and IGF ETF by shared holdings, expense ratio, issuer, category, and tracked overlap.

Tracked overlap1.75%

6 shared holdings

ECNS expense0.00%

Unknown

IGF expense0.00%

Unknown

Data date2026-05-01

2026-05-01

Shared top holdings

Overlap uses the smaller fund weight for each shared holding.

152SHENZHEN INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS LT

0.51%overlap weight

1199COSCO SHIPPING PORTS LTD

0.36%overlap weight

995ANHUI EXPRESSWAY LTD H

0.30%overlap weight

548SHENZHEN EXPRESSWAY CORP LTD H

0.22%overlap weight

107SICHUAN EXPRESS LTD H

0.18%overlap weight

694BEIJING CAPITAL INTERNATIONAL AIRP

0.18%overlap weight

Interpretation

Should you own both ECNS and IGF?

ECNS and IGF share 6 tracked holdings with 1.75% overlap in the imported holdings set. High overlap can be fine when the funds serve a deliberate role, but it can also mean less diversification than the ticker count suggests.

Use the portfolio analyzer to test your actual allocations. Pairwise overlap does not account for how much of each ETF you own.