ETF comparison

BRLN vs ESML overlap

Compare BRLN ETF and ESML ETF by shared holdings, expense ratio, issuer, category, and tracked overlap.

Tracked overlap4.61%

47 shared holdings

BRLN expense0.00%

Unknown

ESML expense0.00%

Unknown

Data date2026-05-01

2026-05-01

Shared top holdings

Overlap uses the smaller fund weight for each shared holding.

APGAPI GROUP (API GROUP DE INC) TL-B

0.21%overlap weight

JAZZJAZZ PHARMACEUTICALS (JAZZ FINANCI TL-B2

0.19%overlap weight

CNMCORE & MAIN (CORE & MAIN LP) TL-D

0.18%overlap weight

CNMCORE & MAIN (CORE & MAIN LP) TL-E

0.18%overlap weight

MKSIMKS (MKS INC) TL-B

0.18%overlap weight

ALSNALLISON TRANSMISSION(ALLISON TRAN) TL-B

0.16%overlap weight

Interpretation

Should you own both BRLN and ESML?

BRLN and ESML share 47 tracked holdings with 4.61% overlap in the imported holdings set. High overlap can be fine when the funds serve a deliberate role, but it can also mean less diversification than the ticker count suggests.

Use the portfolio analyzer to test your actual allocations. Pairwise overlap does not account for how much of each ETF you own.