ETF comparison

BELT vs ILCG overlap

Compare BELT ETF and ILCG ETF by shared holdings, expense ratio, issuer, category, and tracked overlap.

Tracked overlap28.21%

13 shared holdings

BELT expense0.00%

Unknown

ILCG expense0.00%

Unknown

Data date2026-05-01

2026-05-01

Shared top holdings

Overlap uses the smaller fund weight for each shared holding.

AVGOBROADCOM INC

6.12%overlap weight

AMZNAMAZON.COM INC

5.68%overlap weight

METAMETA PLATFORMS INC CLASS A

4.75%overlap weight

MSFTMICROSOFT CORP

4.69%overlap weight

GOOGALPHABET INC CLASS C

3.93%overlap weight

MAMASTERCARD INC CLASS A

1.38%overlap weight

Interpretation

Should you own both BELT and ILCG?

BELT and ILCG share 13 tracked holdings with 28.21% overlap in the imported holdings set. High overlap can be fine when the funds serve a deliberate role, but it can also mean less diversification than the ticker count suggests.

Use the portfolio analyzer to test your actual allocations. Pairwise overlap does not account for how much of each ETF you own.