ETF comparison

AOM vs ITDB overlap

Compare AOM ETF and ITDB ETF by shared holdings, expense ratio, issuer, category, and tracked overlap.

Tracked overlap68.35%

1276 shared holdings

AOM expense0.00%

Unknown

ITDB expense0.00%

Unknown

Data date2026-05-01

2026-05-01

Shared top holdings

Overlap uses the smaller fund weight for each shared holding.

IDEVISHARES CORE MSCI INT DEVEL ETF

11.37%overlap weight

TNOTETREASURY NOTE

10.75%overlap weight

IEMGISHARES CORE MSCI EMERGING MARKETS

4.89%overlap weight

TBONDTREASURY BOND

3.47%overlap weight

NVDANVIDIA CORP

1.97%overlap weight

AAPLAPPLE INC

1.54%overlap weight

Interpretation

Should you own both AOM and ITDB?

AOM and ITDB share 1276 tracked holdings with 68.35% overlap in the imported holdings set. High overlap can be fine when the funds serve a deliberate role, but it can also mean less diversification than the ticker count suggests.

Use the portfolio analyzer to test your actual allocations. Pairwise overlap does not account for how much of each ETF you own.