ETF comparison

AOM vs IRTR overlap

Compare AOM ETF and IRTR ETF by shared holdings, expense ratio, issuer, category, and tracked overlap.

Tracked overlap67.23%

1230 shared holdings

AOM expense0.00%

Unknown

IRTR expense0.00%

Unknown

Data date2026-05-01

2026-05-01

Shared top holdings

Overlap uses the smaller fund weight for each shared holding.

TNOTETREASURY NOTE

14.56%overlap weight

IDEVISHARES CORE MSCI INT DEVEL ETF

9.57%overlap weight

IEMGISHARES CORE MSCI EMERGING MARKETS

4.71%overlap weight

TBONDTREASURY BOND

3.47%overlap weight

NVDANVIDIA CORP

1.88%overlap weight

AAPLAPPLE INC

1.49%overlap weight

Interpretation

Should you own both AOM and IRTR?

AOM and IRTR share 1230 tracked holdings with 67.23% overlap in the imported holdings set. High overlap can be fine when the funds serve a deliberate role, but it can also mean less diversification than the ticker count suggests.

Use the portfolio analyzer to test your actual allocations. Pairwise overlap does not account for how much of each ETF you own.