ETF comparison

AOA vs AOM overlap

Compare AOA ETF and AOM ETF by shared holdings, expense ratio, issuer, category, and tracked overlap.

Tracked overlap101.81%

1248 shared holdings

AOA expense0.00%

Unknown

AOM expense0.00%

Unknown

Data date2026-05-01

2026-05-01

Shared top holdings

Overlap uses the smaller fund weight for each shared holding.

IVVISHARES CORE S&P ETF TRUST

23.76%overlap weight

IUSBISHARES CORE UNIV USD BOND ETF

15.90%overlap weight

IDEVISHARES CORE MSCI INT DEVEL ETF

11.37%overlap weight

IEMGISHARES CORE MSCI EMERGING MARKETS

4.89%overlap weight

TNOTETREASURY NOTE

4.68%overlap weight

IAGGiShares Core Intl Aggregate Bnd ET

2.76%overlap weight

Interpretation

Should you own both AOA and AOM?

AOA and AOM share 1248 tracked holdings with 101.81% overlap in the imported holdings set. High overlap can be fine when the funds serve a deliberate role, but it can also mean less diversification than the ticker count suggests.

Use the portfolio analyzer to test your actual allocations. Pairwise overlap does not account for how much of each ETF you own.